head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs snmp_exporter
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. snmp_exporter has 2,193 stars, 749 forks, 103 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 4,149% (93,190 vs 2,193 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; snmp_exporter is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, snmp_exporter 34%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | snmp_exporter | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 2.2K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-29 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 749 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick snmp_exporter if
- You want the snmp_exporter feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and snmp_exporter fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About snmp_exporter
Prometheus SNMP Exporter [ ][quay] [ ][hub] This exporter is the recommended way to expose SNMP data in a format which Prometheus can ingest. To simply get started, it's recommended to use the if mib module with switches, access points, or routers using the public v2 auth module, which should be a read only access community on the target device. Note, community strings in SNMP are not considered secrets, as they are sent unencrypted in SNMP v1 and v2c. For secure access, SNMP v3 is required. Concepts While SNMP uses a hierarchical data structure and Prometheus uses an n dimensional matrix, the two systems map…
read the full snmp_exporter overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or snmp_exporter more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and snmp_exporter has 2,193. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and snmp_exporter free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and snmp_exporter under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and snmp_exporter?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and snmp_exporter in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or snmp_exporter?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose snmp_exporter if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.