head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs qtap
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. qtap has 1,465 stars, 57 forks, 8 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 6,261% (93,190 vs 1,465 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; qtap is written in C under Apache-2.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, qtap 4%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | qtap | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 1.5K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | C |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-29 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 57 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick qtap if
- You want the qtap feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches C
- You evaluated both and qtap fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About qtap
An eBPF agent that captures traffic flowing through the Linux kernel. By attaching to TLS/SSL functions, data is intercepted before and after encryption and then passed to flexible plugins with full visibility along with all of the available context process/container/host/user/protocol/etc. Qtap makes it possible to understand what's happening with your egress traffic, without modifying apps, installing proxies, or managing certs. Qtap shows you exactly what data is being sent and received in its original, unencrypted form while operating out of band with minimal overhead, without adding latency or disrupting…
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or qtap more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and qtap has 1,465. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and qtap free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and qtap under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and qtap?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and qtap in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or qtap?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose qtap if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.