head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs Pulse
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Pulse has 7,251 stars, 380 forks, 46 open issues and last shipped 23 days ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 1,185% (93,190 vs 7,251 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; Pulse is written in Swift under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Pulse 5%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | Pulse | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 7.3K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | Swift |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-11 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 380 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Pulse if
- You want the Pulse feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Swift
- You evaluated both and Pulse fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About Pulse
Pulse is a powerful logging system for Apple Platforms. Native. Built with SwiftUI. Record and inspect logs and URLSession network requests right from your iOS app. Share logs and view them in Pulse Pro or use remote logging to see them in real time. Logs are stored locally and never leave your devices. About Pulse is not just a tool, it's a framework. It records events from URLSession or from frameworks that use it, such as Alamofire or Get, and displays them using PulseUI views that you integrate directly into your app. This way Pulse console is available for everyone who has your test builds. You or your QA…
read the full Pulse overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or Pulse more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and Pulse has 7,251. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and Pulse free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and Pulse under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and Pulse?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and Pulse in Swift. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or Pulse?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Pulse if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.