head to head · open source

Uptime Kuma vs psutil

Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. psutil has 11,313 stars, 1,539 forks, 258 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 724% (93,190 vs 11,313 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; psutil is written in Python under BSD-3-Clause. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, psutil 14%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Uptime Kuma ★ 93K psutil ★ 11K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Uptime Kuma psutil
GitHub stars ★ 93K ★ 11K
License MIT BSD-3-Clause
Written in JavaScript Python
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-11-01
Forks ⑂ 8.7K ⑂ 1.5K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Uptime Kuma if

  • You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Uptime Kuma profile →

pick psutil if

  • You want the psutil feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and psutil fits your workflow better

full psutil profile →

About Uptime Kuma

Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…

read the full Uptime Kuma overview →

About psutil

.. .. raw:: html Process and System Utilities for Python Documentation Blog Who uses psutil .. About ===== psutil is a cross platform library for retrieving information about running processes and system utilization (CPU, memory, disks, network, sensors) in Python. It is useful mainly for system monitoring , profiling , limiting process resources , and managing running processes . It implements many functionalities offered by UNIX command line tool such as ps, top, free, iotop, netstat, ifconfig, lsof and others (see shell equivalents ). Psutil supports the following platforms: Linux Windows macOS FreeBSD…

read the full psutil overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Uptime Kuma or psutil more popular?

Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and psutil has 11,313. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.

Are Uptime Kuma and psutil free?

Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and psutil under BSD-3-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and psutil?

Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and psutil in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or psutil?

Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose psutil if its feature set, stack or BSD-3-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.