head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs phoenix_live_dashboard
Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars, 8,431 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped today. phoenix_live_dashboard has 2,171 stars, 207 forks, 17 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 4,115% (91,498 vs 2,171 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; phoenix_live_dashboard is written in Elixir under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, phoenix_live_dashboard 10%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | phoenix_live_dashboard | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 91K | ★ 2.2K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | Elixir |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-16 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 207 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick phoenix_live_dashboard if
- You want the phoenix_live_dashboard feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Elixir
- You evaluated both and phoenix_live_dashboard fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted monitoring tool with a reactive web dashboard, built for operators and teams that want to watch their own HTTP, TCP, and DNS endpoints and keep the resulting data on their own infrastructure.
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About phoenix_live_dashboard
Phoenix LiveDashboard Online Documentation. LiveDashboard provides real time performance monitoring and debugging tools for Phoenix developers. It provides the following modules: Home See general information about the system OS Data See general information about OS, such as CPU, Memory and Disk usage Metrics See how your application performs under different conditions by visualizing :telemetry events with real time charts Request logging See everything that was logged for certain requests Applications See, filter, and search applications in the current node and view their processes in a supervision tree Processes…
read the full phoenix_live_dashboard overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or phoenix_live_dashboard more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars and phoenix_live_dashboard has 2,171. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and phoenix_live_dashboard free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and phoenix_live_dashboard under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and phoenix_live_dashboard?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and phoenix_live_dashboard in Elixir. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or phoenix_live_dashboard?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (91,498 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose phoenix_live_dashboard if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.