head to head · open source

Uptime Kuma vs phoenix_live_dashboard

Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. phoenix_live_dashboard has 2,176 stars, 206 forks, 17 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 4,183% (93,190 vs 2,176 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; phoenix_live_dashboard is written in Elixir under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, phoenix_live_dashboard 9%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Uptime Kuma ★ 93K phoenix_live_dashboard ★ 2.2K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Uptime Kuma phoenix_live_dashboard
GitHub stars ★ 93K ★ 2.2K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript Elixir
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 8.7K ⑂ 206
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Uptime Kuma if

  • You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Uptime Kuma profile →

pick phoenix_live_dashboard if

  • You want the phoenix_live_dashboard feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Elixir
  • You evaluated both and phoenix_live_dashboard fits your workflow better

full phoenix_live_dashboard profile →

About Uptime Kuma

Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…

read the full Uptime Kuma overview →

About phoenix_live_dashboard

Phoenix LiveDashboard Online Documentation. LiveDashboard provides real time performance monitoring and debugging tools for Phoenix developers. It provides the following modules: Home See general information about the system OS Data See general information about OS, such as CPU, Memory and Disk usage Metrics See how your application performs under different conditions by visualizing :telemetry events with real time charts Request logging See everything that was logged for certain requests Applications See, filter, and search applications in the current node and view their processes in a supervision tree…

read the full phoenix_live_dashboard overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Uptime Kuma or phoenix_live_dashboard more popular?

Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and phoenix_live_dashboard has 2,176. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.

Are Uptime Kuma and phoenix_live_dashboard free?

Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and phoenix_live_dashboard under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and phoenix_live_dashboard?

Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and phoenix_live_dashboard in Elixir. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or phoenix_live_dashboard?

Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose phoenix_live_dashboard if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.