head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs pgmetrics
Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars, 8,431 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. pgmetrics has 1,111 stars, 80 forks, 12 open issues and last shipped 10 days ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 8,136% (91,498 vs 1,111 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; pgmetrics is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, pgmetrics 7%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 13541 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | pgmetrics | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 91K | ★ 1.1K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-09 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 80 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick pgmetrics if
- You want the pgmetrics feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and pgmetrics fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted monitoring tool with a reactive web dashboard, built for operators and teams that want to watch their own HTTP, TCP, and DNS endpoints and keep the resulting data on their own infrastructure.
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About pgmetrics
pgmetrics is an open source, Apache 2.0 licensed Go command line tool that collects and displays information and statistics from a running PostgreSQL server, aimed at database administrators, site reliability engineers, and platform teams who troubleshoot, monitor, or automate PostgreSQL.
read the full pgmetrics overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or pgmetrics more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars and pgmetrics has 1,111. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and pgmetrics free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and pgmetrics under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and pgmetrics?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and pgmetrics in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or pgmetrics?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (91,498 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose pgmetrics if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.