head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs Peekaping
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Peekaping has 1,210 stars, 87 forks, 92 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 7,602% (93,190 vs 1,210 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; Peekaping is written in Go under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Peekaping 7%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 6 topic tags (monitor, monitoring, self-hosted, selfhosted), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | Peekaping | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 1.2K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-31 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 87 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Peekaping if
- You want the Peekaping feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and Peekaping fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About Peekaping
Peekaping the best uptime kuma alternative A modern, self hosted uptime monitoring solution Peekaping is a uptime monitoring system built with Golang and React. You can monitor your websites, API and many more leveraging beautiful status pages, alert notifications. 🔗 Website peekaping.com 🔗 Live Demo demo.peekaping.com 🔗 Documentation docs.peekaping.com 🔗 Community terraform provider registry.terraform.io/providers/tafaust/peekaping Why Peekaping Is the Optimal Alternative to Uptime Kuma Peekaping is a modern uptime monitoring solution designed with the requirements of professional DevOps teams in mind…
read the full Peekaping overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or Peekaping more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and Peekaping has 1,210. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and Peekaping free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and Peekaping under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and Peekaping?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and Peekaping in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or Peekaping?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Peekaping if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.