head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs parseable
Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars, 8,431 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped today. parseable has 2,458 stars, 172 forks, 20 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 3,622% (91,498 vs 2,458 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; parseable is written in Rust under AGPL-3.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, parseable 7%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | parseable | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 91K | ★ 2.5K |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 172 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick parseable if
- You want the parseable feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and parseable fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted monitoring tool with a reactive web dashboard, built for operators and teams that want to watch their own HTTP, TCP, and DNS endpoints and keep the resulting data on their own infrastructure.
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About parseable
Introduction • Docs • Features • Benchmarks Parseable is an open source, columnar data lake platform purpose built for observability. Send logs, metrics & traces to Parseable via popular logging agents, OpenTelemetry, Kafka, eBPF or other integrations. Use native observability features like alerting, dashboards, anomaly detection, APM, PromQL & SQL all within a single binary. Why Parseable? Purpose built for observability and designed around proven data engineering patterns, Parseable gives you everything you need to make sense of your telemetry data, right out of the box. Some of the key highlight…
read the full parseable overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or parseable more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars and parseable has 2,458. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and parseable free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and parseable under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and parseable?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and parseable in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or parseable?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (91,498 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose parseable if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.