head to head · open source

Uptime Kuma vs pandaprobe

Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars, 8,431 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped today. pandaprobe has 787 stars, 119 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped 23 days ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 11,526% (91,498 vs 787 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; pandaprobe is written in Python under Apache-2.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, pandaprobe 15%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (monitoring, self-hosted), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Uptime Kuma ★ 91K pandaprobe ★ 787 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Uptime Kuma pandaprobe
GitHub stars ★ 91K ★ 787
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in JavaScript Python
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-08-26
Forks ⑂ 8.4K ⑂ 119
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Uptime Kuma if

  • You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Uptime Kuma profile →

pick pandaprobe if

  • You want the pandaprobe feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and pandaprobe fits your workflow better

full pandaprobe profile →

About Uptime Kuma

Uptime Kuma is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted monitoring tool with a reactive web dashboard, built for operators and teams that want to watch their own HTTP, TCP, and DNS endpoints and keep the resulting data on their own infrastructure.

read the full Uptime Kuma overview →

About pandaprobe

What is PandaProbe? PandaProbe is an open source agent engineering platform. It helps teams collaboratively trace, evaluate, monitor, and debug AI agents. You can use PandaProbe cloud or self host the service. Documentation Visit our client library documentation for quickstart and explore advance integrations . PandaProbe Cloud Managed deployment by the PandaProbe team, generous free tier, no credit card required. Self host PandaProbe Prerequisites: Docker must be installed and running. Once running, open: Dashboard — API reference — Architecture Services Contributing We welcome contributions! Please read the Con…

read the full pandaprobe overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K Grafana ★ 77K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn uptime-kuma vs openvpn uptime-kuma vs wr-do uptime-kuma vs plakar uptime-kuma vs pluton worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Uptime Kuma vs worldmonitor Uptime Kuma vs NetData Uptime Kuma vs Grafana Uptime Kuma vs huginn Uptime Kuma vs Sentry Uptime Kuma vs SigNoz Uptime Kuma vs Grafana Loki Uptime Kuma vs beszel Uptime Kuma vs cilium Uptime Kuma vs Apache SkyWalking Uptime Kuma vs jaeger Uptime Kuma vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is Uptime Kuma or pandaprobe more popular?

Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars and pandaprobe has 787. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.

Are Uptime Kuma and pandaprobe free?

Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and pandaprobe under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and pandaprobe?

Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and pandaprobe in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or pandaprobe?

Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (91,498 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose pandaprobe if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.