head to head · open source

Uptime Kuma vs otelbin

Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. otelbin has 584 stars, 31 forks, 53 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 15,857% (93,190 vs 584 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; otelbin is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, otelbin 5%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Uptime Kuma ★ 93K otelbin ★ 584 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Uptime Kuma otelbin
GitHub stars ★ 93K ★ 584
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 8.7K ⑂ 31
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Uptime Kuma if

  • You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Uptime Kuma profile →

pick otelbin if

  • You want the otelbin feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and otelbin fits your workflow better

full otelbin profile →

About Uptime Kuma

Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…

read the full Uptime Kuma overview →

About otelbin

OTelBin OTelBin is a configuration tool for OpenTelemetry collector pipelines. Introduction · Features · Badges · Tech Stack · Contributing · License Introduction OTelBin is a configuration tool to help you get the most out of the OpenTelemetry Collector. OTelBin hosted with :heart: by the Dash0 people at otelbin.io. Features OTelBin will enable you to: 1. Visualize for you the configured OpenTelemetry Collector pipelines as swimlanes 1. Validate your configuration and highlight errors 1. Enable you to share your OpenTelemetry Collector configurations online (requires login with a GitHub or Google account)…

read the full otelbin overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Uptime Kuma or otelbin more popular?

Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and otelbin has 584. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.

Are Uptime Kuma and otelbin free?

Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and otelbin under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and otelbin?

Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and otelbin in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or otelbin?

Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose otelbin if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.