head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs openwolf
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. openwolf has 2,401 stars, 212 forks, 56 open issues and last shipped 15 days ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 3,781% (93,190 vs 2,401 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; openwolf is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, openwolf 9%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | openwolf | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 2.4K |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 212 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick openwolf if
- You want the openwolf feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and openwolf fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About openwolf
OpenWolf Keep project memory across your coding agents. OpenWolf keeps task context, project maps and known fixes in one local folder. Help Claude Code, Codex and OpenCode continue saved work and find relevant code. Reduce repeated context and review recorded token usage by agent and model. Memory and indexing run locally without extra model calls. Hooks: Claude Code, Codex CLI · Plugin: OpenCode · Compatible hooks: Grok Build · Context only: Cursor, Gemini CLI, Antigravity What it does A coding session produces useful context: the task objective, files changed, failed tests and the next action. That information…
read the full openwolf overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or openwolf more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and openwolf has 2,401. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and openwolf free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and openwolf under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and openwolf?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and openwolf in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or openwolf?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose openwolf if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.