head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs opentelemetry-dotnet
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. opentelemetry-dotnet has 3,767 stars, 913 forks, 143 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 2,374% (93,190 vs 3,767 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; opentelemetry-dotnet is written in C# under Apache-2.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, opentelemetry-dotnet 24%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | opentelemetry-dotnet | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 3.8K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | C# |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 913 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick opentelemetry-dotnet if
- You want the opentelemetry-dotnet feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches C#
- You evaluated both and opentelemetry-dotnet fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About opentelemetry-dotnet
OpenTelemetry .NET The .NET OpenTelemetry implementation. Table of Contents Supported .NET versions Project status Getting started Getting started with Logging Getting started with Metrics Getting started with Tracing Repository structure Troubleshooting Extensibility Releases Contributing References Supported .NET versions Packages shipped from this repository generally support all the officially supported versions of .NET and .NET Framework (an older Windows based .NET implementation), except .NET Framework 3.5 . Any exceptions to this are noted in the individual README.md files. Project status Stable across…
read the full opentelemetry-dotnet overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or opentelemetry-dotnet more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and opentelemetry-dotnet has 3,767. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and opentelemetry-dotnet free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and opentelemetry-dotnet under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and opentelemetry-dotnet?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and opentelemetry-dotnet in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or opentelemetry-dotnet?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose opentelemetry-dotnet if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.