head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs open-multi-agent
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. open-multi-agent has 7,043 stars, 2,440 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 1,223% (93,190 vs 7,043 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; open-multi-agent is written in TypeScript under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, open-multi-agent 35%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | open-multi-agent | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 7.0K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-29 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 2.4K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick open-multi-agent if
- You want the open-multi-agent feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and open-multi-agent fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About open-multi-agent
OMA Agents your organization can own, approve, and audit. OMA (Open Multi Agent) is a self hosted TypeScript agent runtime: consequential actions wait for durable, tamper evident approvals, and every run leaves a record you can verify offline, byte for byte. Website · Docs · Examples · npm English · 中文 No telemetry. No hosted control plane. Your keys, your models — cloud, local (Ollama, vLLM, llama server), or Chinese providers — your environment. Nothing stops working when the people who built it leave. Get started Requires Node.js 20 or newer. For production, use a currently maintained Node.js LTS release…
read the full open-multi-agent overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or open-multi-agent more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and open-multi-agent has 7,043. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and open-multi-agent free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and open-multi-agent under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and open-multi-agent?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and open-multi-agent in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or open-multi-agent?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose open-multi-agent if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.