head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs monoscope
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. monoscope has 2,032 stars, 87 forks, 32 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 4,486% (93,190 vs 2,032 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; monoscope is written in Haskell under AGPL-3.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, monoscope 4%. monoscope was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (monitoring, self-hosted), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | monoscope | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 2.0K |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Haskell |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 87 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick monoscope if
- You want the monoscope feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Haskell
- You evaluated both and monoscope fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About monoscope
Open source observability platform with S3 storage Ingest and explore logs, traces, and metrics stored in your S3 buckets. Query with natural language. Create AI agents that detect anomalies and send daily/weekly reports to your inbox. Website • Playground • Discord • Twitter • Documentation What is Monoscope? • Cloud vs Self hosted • Quick Start • AI Agents • Roadmap What is Monoscope? Monoscope is an open source observability platform that stores your telemetry data in S3 compatible storage. Self host it or use our cloud offering. Core capabilities: 💰 S3 storage — Store years of logs, metrics, and traces…
read the full monoscope overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or monoscope more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and monoscope has 2,032. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and monoscope free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and monoscope under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and monoscope?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and monoscope in Haskell. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or monoscope?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose monoscope if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.