head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs Microsoft365DSC
Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars, 8,431 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Microsoft365DSC has 2,393 stars, 677 forks, 66 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 3,724% (91,498 vs 2,393 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; Microsoft365DSC is written in PowerShell under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Microsoft365DSC 28%. Microsoft365DSC was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 13541 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | Microsoft365DSC | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 91K | ★ 2.4K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | PowerShell |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 677 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Microsoft365DSC if
- You want the Microsoft365DSC feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches PowerShell
- You evaluated both and Microsoft365DSC fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted monitoring tool with a reactive web dashboard, built for operators and teams that want to watch their own HTTP, TCP, and DNS endpoints and keep the resulting data on their own infrastructure.
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About Microsoft365DSC
Microsoft365DSC is a PowerShell Desired State Configuration module that automates the deployment, configuration, extraction, reporting and monitoring of Microsoft 365 tenant settings, and it is built for Microsoft 365 administrators and DevOps teams who want tenant configuration managed as code rather than by hand in individual admin portals.
read the full Microsoft365DSC overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or Microsoft365DSC more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars and Microsoft365DSC has 2,393. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and Microsoft365DSC free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and Microsoft365DSC under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and Microsoft365DSC?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and Microsoft365DSC in PowerShell. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or Microsoft365DSC?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (91,498 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Microsoft365DSC if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.