head to head · open source

Uptime Kuma vs loongsuite-go

Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars, 8,431 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped today. loongsuite-go has 902 stars, 124 forks, 30 open issues and last shipped 18 days ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 10,044% (91,498 vs 902 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; loongsuite-go is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, loongsuite-go 14%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Uptime Kuma ★ 91K loongsuite-go ★ 902 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Uptime Kuma loongsuite-go
GitHub stars ★ 91K ★ 902
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in JavaScript Go
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-08-31
Forks ⑂ 8.4K ⑂ 124
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Uptime Kuma if

  • You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Uptime Kuma profile →

pick loongsuite-go if

  • You want the loongsuite-go feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and loongsuite-go fits your workflow better

full loongsuite-go profile →

About Uptime Kuma

Uptime Kuma is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted monitoring tool with a reactive web dashboard, built for operators and teams that want to watch their own HTTP, TCP, and DNS endpoints and keep the resulting data on their own infrastructure.

read the full Uptime Kuma overview →

About loongsuite-go

Loongsuite Go Agent provides an automatic solution for Golang applications that want to leverage OpenTelemetry to enable effective observability. No code changes are required in the target application, the instrumentation is done at compile time. Simply adding otel prefix to go build to get started :rocket: Installation [!IMPORTANT] Requires Go 1.25 or newer. loongsuite go pins OpenTelemetry v1.45.0, and the OTel modules declare go 1.25.0 from v1.42.0 onward. Since the tool injects those modules into the application it instruments, both the tool and the instrumented application need Go 1.25+. See compatibility. P…

read the full loongsuite-go overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K Grafana ★ 77K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn uptime-kuma vs openvpn uptime-kuma vs wr-do uptime-kuma vs plakar uptime-kuma vs pluton worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Uptime Kuma vs worldmonitor Uptime Kuma vs NetData Uptime Kuma vs Grafana Uptime Kuma vs huginn Uptime Kuma vs Sentry Uptime Kuma vs SigNoz Uptime Kuma vs Grafana Loki Uptime Kuma vs beszel Uptime Kuma vs cilium Uptime Kuma vs Apache SkyWalking Uptime Kuma vs jaeger Uptime Kuma vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is Uptime Kuma or loongsuite-go more popular?

Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars and loongsuite-go has 902. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.

Are Uptime Kuma and loongsuite-go free?

Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and loongsuite-go under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and loongsuite-go?

Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and loongsuite-go in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or loongsuite-go?

Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (91,498 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose loongsuite-go if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.