head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs logtape
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. logtape has 2,023 stars, 55 forks, 12 open issues and last shipped 15 days ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 4,507% (93,190 vs 2,023 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; logtape is written in TypeScript under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, logtape 3%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | logtape | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 2.0K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 55 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick logtape if
- You want the logtape feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and logtape fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About logtape
LogTape ======= [![JSR][JSR badge]][JSR] [![npm][npm badge]][npm] [![Bundlephobia][Bundlephobia badge]][Bundlephobia] [![GitHub Actions][GitHub Actions badge]][GitHub Actions] [![Codecov][Codecov badge]][Codecov] LogTape is a logging library for JavaScript and TypeScript designed with a library first philosophy. Unlike traditional loggers, LogTape is unobtrusive—libraries can safely log without any configuration, while applications retain full control. With zero dependencies and universal runtime support, it works seamlessly across Deno, Node.js, Bun, browsers, and edge functions. The highlights of LogTape are…
read the full logtape overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or logtape more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and logtape has 2,023. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and logtape free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and logtape under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and logtape?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and logtape in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or logtape?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose logtape if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.