head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs loglayer
Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars, 8,431 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. loglayer has 545 stars, 11 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 16,689% (91,498 vs 545 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; loglayer is written in TypeScript under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, loglayer 2%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 13541 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | loglayer | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 91K | ★ 545 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-07-13 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 11 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick loglayer if
- You want the loglayer feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and loglayer fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted monitoring tool with a reactive web dashboard, built for operators and teams that want to watch their own HTTP, TCP, and DNS endpoints and keep the resulting data on their own infrastructure.
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About loglayer
LogLayer is a TypeScript logging library that acts as a unified logger, routing log messages to other logging libraries, cloud providers, files, StatsD and OpenTelemetry through a fluent API, and it is aimed at JavaScript and TypeScript developers building for Node.js, Bun, Deno, the browser, Next.js and Electron.
read the full loglayer overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or loglayer more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars and loglayer has 545. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and loglayer free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and loglayer under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and loglayer?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and loglayer in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or loglayer?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (91,498 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose loglayer if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.