head to head · open source

Uptime Kuma vs lindb

Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. lindb has 3,066 stars, 286 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 2,939% (93,190 vs 3,066 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; lindb is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, lindb 9%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Uptime Kuma ★ 93K lindb ★ 3.1K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Uptime Kuma lindb
GitHub stars ★ 93K ★ 3.1K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in JavaScript Go
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-07-27
Forks ⑂ 8.7K ⑂ 286
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Uptime Kuma if

  • You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Uptime Kuma profile →

pick lindb if

  • You want the lindb feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and lindb fits your workflow better

full lindb profile →

About Uptime Kuma

Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…

read the full Uptime Kuma overview →

About lindb

English 简体中文 日本語 What is LinDB? LinDB is an open source Time Series Database which provides high performance, high availability and horizontal scalability. Key features Guide Quick start Design Architecture Admin UI Build Prerequisites To build LinDB from source you require the following on your system. Go =1.21 Make tool Yarn Get the code Build from source To build only LinDB core.(without web console) To build both LinDB core and frontend. Test Access web interface(for developer) Start the node.js app to view LinDB web interface in dev mode. You can access the LinDB web interface on your localhost port 3000…

read the full lindb overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Uptime Kuma or lindb more popular?

Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and lindb has 3,066. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.

Are Uptime Kuma and lindb free?

Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and lindb under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and lindb?

Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and lindb in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or lindb?

Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose lindb if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.