head to head · open source

Uptime Kuma vs LibreHardwareMonitor

Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. LibreHardwareMonitor has 9,328 stars, 1,048 forks, 524 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 899% (93,190 vs 9,328 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; LibreHardwareMonitor is written in C# under MPL-2.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, LibreHardwareMonitor 11%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (monitor, monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Uptime Kuma ★ 93K LibreHardwareMonitor ★ 9.3K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Uptime Kuma LibreHardwareMonitor
GitHub stars ★ 93K ★ 9.3K
License MIT MPL-2.0
Written in JavaScript C#
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-10-29
Forks ⑂ 8.7K ⑂ 1.0K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Uptime Kuma if

  • You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Uptime Kuma profile →

pick LibreHardwareMonitor if

  • You want the LibreHardwareMonitor feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You evaluated both and LibreHardwareMonitor fits your workflow better

full LibreHardwareMonitor profile →

About Uptime Kuma

Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…

read the full Uptime Kuma overview →

About LibreHardwareMonitor

LibreHardwareMonitor Libre Hardware Monitor is free software that can monitor the temperature sensors, fan speeds, voltages, load and clock speeds of your computer. What's included? What can it do? You can read information from devices such as: Motherboards Intel and AMD processors NVIDIA, AMD and Intel graphics cards HDD, SSD and NVMe hard drives Network cards Where can I download it? You can download the latest release here. Nightly builds If you have a GitHub account, you can download nightly builds here. Otherwise, you can download the latest nightly build here. How can I help improve it? The…

read the full LibreHardwareMonitor overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Uptime Kuma or LibreHardwareMonitor more popular?

Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and LibreHardwareMonitor has 9,328. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.

Are Uptime Kuma and LibreHardwareMonitor free?

Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and LibreHardwareMonitor under MPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and LibreHardwareMonitor?

Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and LibreHardwareMonitor in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or LibreHardwareMonitor?

Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose LibreHardwareMonitor if its feature set, stack or MPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.