head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs LibreHardwareMonitor
Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars, 8,431 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped today. LibreHardwareMonitor has 9,084 stars, 1,015 forks, 524 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 907% (91,498 vs 9,084 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; LibreHardwareMonitor is written in C# under MPL-2.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, LibreHardwareMonitor 11%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (monitor, monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | LibreHardwareMonitor | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 91K | ★ 9.1K |
| License | MIT | MPL-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | C# |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 1.0K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick LibreHardwareMonitor if
- You want the LibreHardwareMonitor feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MPL-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches C#
- You evaluated both and LibreHardwareMonitor fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted monitoring tool with a reactive web dashboard, built for operators and teams that want to watch their own HTTP, TCP, and DNS endpoints and keep the resulting data on their own infrastructure.
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About LibreHardwareMonitor
LibreHardwareMonitor is a free, open source, MPL 2.0 licensed hardware monitoring application and .NET library that reads the temperature sensors, fan speeds, voltages, load and clock speeds of a computer's motherboard, processor, graphics cards, drives and network cards, aimed at Windows users who want that telemetry on screen and at C developers who want it inside their own applications.
read the full LibreHardwareMonitor overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or LibreHardwareMonitor more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars and LibreHardwareMonitor has 9,084. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and LibreHardwareMonitor free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and LibreHardwareMonitor under MPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and LibreHardwareMonitor?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and LibreHardwareMonitor in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or LibreHardwareMonitor?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (91,498 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose LibreHardwareMonitor if its feature set, stack or MPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.