head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs laravel-http-logger
Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars, 8,431 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. laravel-http-logger has 674 stars, 59 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 13,475% (91,498 vs 674 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; laravel-http-logger is written in PHP under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, laravel-http-logger 9%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 13541 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | laravel-http-logger | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 91K | ★ 674 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | PHP |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-07-14 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 59 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick laravel-http-logger if
- You want the laravel-http-logger feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches PHP
- You evaluated both and laravel-http-logger fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted monitoring tool with a reactive web dashboard, built for operators and teams that want to watch their own HTTP, TCP, and DNS endpoints and keep the resulting data on their own infrastructure.
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About laravel-http-logger
A Laravel middleware package from Spatie that logs incoming HTTP request data to the application's default log, built for teams that need a safety net when a critical user submission fails partway through. It is for Laravel developers and platform teams running lead generation forms, checkout flows, or any endpoint where losing the original request body would mean losing the customer.
read the full laravel-http-logger overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or laravel-http-logger more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars and laravel-http-logger has 674. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and laravel-http-logger free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and laravel-http-logger under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and laravel-http-logger?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and laravel-http-logger in PHP. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or laravel-http-logger?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (91,498 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose laravel-http-logger if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.