head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs kindling
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. kindling has 1,063 stars, 166 forks, 27 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 8,667% (93,190 vs 1,063 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; kindling is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, kindling 16%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | kindling | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 1.1K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-07-21 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 166 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick kindling if
- You want the kindling feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and kindling fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About kindling
Kindling Visit our Kindling website for more information. What is Kindling Kindling is an eBPF based cloud native monitoring tool, which aims to help users understand the app behavior from kernel to code stack. With trace profiling , we hope the user can understand the application's behavior easily and find the root cause in seconds. Besides trace profiling, Kindling provides an easy way to get an overview of network flows in the Kubernetes environment, and many built in network monitor dashboards like TCP retransmit, DNS, throughput, and TPS. Not only as a network monitor, but Kindling is also trying to analyze…
read the full kindling overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or kindling more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and kindling has 1,063. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and kindling free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and kindling under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and kindling?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and kindling in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or kindling?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose kindling if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.