head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs kdash
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. kdash has 2,559 stars, 97 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped 20 days ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 3,542% (93,190 vs 2,559 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; kdash is written in Rust under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, kdash 4%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | kdash | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 2.6K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-14 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 97 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick kdash if
- You want the kdash feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and kdash fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About kdash
KDash A fast and simple dashboard for Kubernetes A simple terminal dashboard for Kubernetes built with Rust Contents What's new in 2.0 Installation Usage Keybindings Configuration Flags Limitations / Known issues Features Screenshots What's new in 2.0 Resource management actions let you act on what you're watching without leaving KDash: delete any resource ( Ctrl d ), edit any resource in your $EDITOR ( e ), rollout restart workloads ( r ), view previous container logs ( p ), scale workloads, and cordon nodes or suspend/resume/trigger CronJobs from a new action menu ( m ). Impactful actions are guarded by a…
read the full kdash overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or kdash more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and kdash has 2,559. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and kdash free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and kdash under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and kdash?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and kdash in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or kdash?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose kdash if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.