head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs graphite-web
Uptime Kuma has 91,477 GitHub stars, 8,426 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. graphite-web has 6,118 stars, 1,255 forks, 25 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 1,395% (91,477 vs 6,118 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; graphite-web is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, graphite-web 21%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | graphite-web | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 91K | ★ 6.1K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-07 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 1.3K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick graphite-web if
- You want the graphite-web feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and graphite-web fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted monitoring tool with a reactive web dashboard, built for operators and teams that want to watch their own HTTP, TCP, and DNS endpoints and keep the resulting data on their own infrastructure.
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About graphite-web
Graphite Web is the Django based web application that renders graphs and dashboards for the Graphite monitoring stack, aimed at infrastructure and operations teams who collect time series metrics and need to visualise them.
read the full graphite-web overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or graphite-web more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 91,477 GitHub stars and graphite-web has 6,118. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and graphite-web free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and graphite-web under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and graphite-web?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and graphite-web in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or graphite-web?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (91,477 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose graphite-web if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.