head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs gpustat
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. gpustat has 4,391 stars, 286 forks, 30 open issues and last shipped 26 days ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 2,022% (93,190 vs 4,391 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; gpustat is written in Python under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, gpustat 7%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | gpustat | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 4.4K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-08 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 286 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick gpustat if
- You want the gpustat feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and gpustat fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About gpustat
gpustat ========= [ ][pypi gpustat] Just less than nvidia smi? NOTE: This works with NVIDIA Graphics Devices only, no AMD support as of now. Contributions are welcome! Self Promotion: A web interface of gpustat is available (in alpha)! Check out [gpustat web][gpustat web]. [gpustat web]: Quick Installation Install from [PyPI][pypi gpustat]: If you don't have root (sudo) privilege, please try installing gpustat on user namespace: pip install user gpustat . To install the latest version (master branch) via pip: NVIDIA Driver and pynvml Requirements [!IMPORTANT] DO NOT: pip install pynvml , nor include [ pynvml…
read the full gpustat overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or gpustat more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and gpustat has 4,391. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and gpustat free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and gpustat under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and gpustat?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and gpustat in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or gpustat?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose gpustat if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.