head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs goose
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. goose has 1,014 stars, 81 forks, 43 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 9,090% (93,190 vs 1,014 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; goose is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, goose 8%. goose was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | goose | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 1.0K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 81 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick goose if
- You want the goose feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and goose fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About goose
Goose: A Powerful Load Testing Framework What is Load Testing? Load testing is a critical step in ensuring your web application can handle real world traffic patterns. It helps you identify performance bottlenecks, optimize resource allocation, and ensure a seamless user experience. Why Choose Goose? Fast and Scalable: Built with Rust, Goose is designed for speed and scalability. Flexible and Customizable: Supports simple and complex load tests, tailored to mimic real world user behavior. Realistic User Behavior Simulation: Goes beyond just sending requests; simulates user behaviors like logging in, filling out…
read the full goose overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or goose more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and goose has 1,014. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and goose free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and goose under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and goose?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and goose in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or goose?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose goose if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.