head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs GoModel
Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars, 8,431 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. GoModel has 1,167 stars, 101 forks, 80 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 7,740% (91,498 vs 1,167 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; GoModel is written in Go under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, GoModel 9%. GoModel was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 13541 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | GoModel | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 91K | ★ 1.2K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 101 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick GoModel if
- You want the GoModel feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and GoModel fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted monitoring tool with a reactive web dashboard, built for operators and teams that want to watch their own HTTP, TCP, and DNS endpoints and keep the resulting data on their own infrastructure.
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About GoModel
GoModel is an MIT licensed AI gateway, control plane and proxy written in Go that exposes one OpenAI compatible endpoint at /v1 and one Anthropic compatible endpoint at /v1/messages in front of OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, Groq, xAI, Ollama, vLLM and many other providers, for teams that run their own LLM traffic and want routing, caching, spend control and observability in a single self hosted service.
read the full GoModel overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or GoModel more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars and GoModel has 1,167. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and GoModel free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and GoModel under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and GoModel?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and GoModel in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or GoModel?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (91,498 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose GoModel if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.