head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs gofr
Uptime Kuma has 91,477 GitHub stars, 8,426 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. gofr has 20,916 stars, 1,759 forks, 132 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 337% (91,477 vs 20,916 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; gofr is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, gofr 8%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | gofr | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 91K | ★ 21K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 1.8K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick gofr if
- You want the gofr feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and gofr fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted monitoring tool with a reactive web dashboard, built for operators and teams that want to watch their own HTTP, TCP, and DNS endpoints and keep the resulting data on their own infrastructure.
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About gofr
GoFr is an opinionated Go framework for building microservices, aimed at Go developers and platform teams who want HTTP, gRPC, data access and observability built in rather than assembled from separate libraries.
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or gofr more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 91,477 GitHub stars and gofr has 20,916. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and gofr free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and gofr under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and gofr?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and gofr in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or gofr?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (91,477 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose gofr if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.