head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs Gigapipe
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Gigapipe has 1,722 stars, 105 forks, 16 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 5,312% (93,190 vs 1,722 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; Gigapipe is written in Go under AGPL-3.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Gigapipe 6%. Gigapipe was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | Gigapipe | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 1.7K |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 105 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Gigapipe if
- You want the Gigapipe feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and Gigapipe fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About Gigapipe
Gigapipe: All In One Polyglot Observability formerly known as qryn :rocket: Gigapipe is a lighweight, multi standard, polyglot observability stack for Logs, Metrics , Traces and Profiling Polyglot : All in one, drop in compatible with Loki , Prometheus , Tempo , Pyroscope Familiar : Use stable & popular LogQL , PromQL , TempoQL languages to query and visualize data Voracious : Ingest using OpenTelemetry, Loki, Prometheus, Tempo, Influx, Datadog, Elastic + more Versatile : Explore data with qryn's built in Explorer and CLI or native Grafana datasource compatibility Secure : Retain total control of data, using…
read the full Gigapipe overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or Gigapipe more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and Gigapipe has 1,722. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and Gigapipe free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and Gigapipe under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and Gigapipe?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and Gigapipe in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or Gigapipe?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Gigapipe if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.