head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs future-agi
Uptime Kuma has 91,477 GitHub stars, 8,426 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. future-agi has 2,031 stars, 628 forks, 889 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 4,404% (91,477 vs 2,031 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; future-agi is written in Python under Apache-2.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, future-agi 31%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | future-agi | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 91K | ★ 2.0K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 628 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick future-agi if
- You want the future-agi feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and future-agi fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted monitoring tool with a reactive web dashboard, built for operators and teams that want to watch their own HTTP, TCP, and DNS endpoints and keep the resulting data on their own infrastructure.
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About future-agi
Future AGI is an open source platform for evaluating, observing, and improving large language model and AI agent applications. It lives in the LLM operations ecosystem, where teams need tracing, evaluations, simulations, datasets, gateway routing, guardrails, and optimization in one Apache 2.0 project.
read the full future-agi overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or future-agi more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 91,477 GitHub stars and future-agi has 2,031. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and future-agi free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and future-agi under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and future-agi?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and future-agi in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or future-agi?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (91,477 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose future-agi if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.