head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs future-agi
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. future-agi has 2,240 stars, 705 forks, 889 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 4,060% (93,190 vs 2,240 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; future-agi is written in Python under Apache-2.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, future-agi 31%. future-agi was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | future-agi | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 2.2K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 705 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick future-agi if
- You want the future-agi feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and future-agi fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About future-agi
⚠️ Nightly release for early testing. Expect rough edges. Stable version coming out soon — please open an issue if you hit anything. AI Agents hallucinate. Fix it faster. The open source platform for shipping self improving AI agents. Evaluations, tracing, simulations, guardrails, gateway, optimization. Everything runs on one platform and one feedback loop, from first prototype to live deployment. Try Cloud (Free) · Self Host · Docs · Blog · Discord · Discussions Why Future AGI? Most AI agents fail in production, and teams end up stitching together evals, observability, and guardrails that never close the loop…
read the full future-agi overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or future-agi more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and future-agi has 2,240. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and future-agi free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and future-agi under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and future-agi?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and future-agi in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or future-agi?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose future-agi if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.