head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs FASTER
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. FASTER has 6,637 stars, 592 forks, 36 open issues and last shipped 15 days ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 1,304% (93,190 vs 6,637 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; FASTER is written in C# under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, FASTER 9%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | FASTER | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 6.6K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | C# |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 592 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick FASTER if
- You want the FASTER feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches C#
- You evaluated both and FASTER fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About FASTER
[!IMPORTANT] This repository is no longer actively maintained. We encourage users to look at Garnet — this project evolves FASTER into a full fledged remote cache store with strong performance (throughput and latency), scalability, storage, recovery, and more. Garnet's storage engine, Tsavorite , is a highly optimized and evolved fork of FASTER. Introduction Managing large application state easily, resiliently, and with high performance is one of the hardest problems in the cloud today. The FASTER project offers two artifacts to help tackle this problem. FASTER Log is a high performance concurrent persistent…
read the full FASTER overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or FASTER more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and FASTER has 6,637. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and FASTER free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and FASTER under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and FASTER?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and FASTER in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or FASTER?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose FASTER if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.