head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs Exceptionless
Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars, 8,431 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped today. Exceptionless has 2,455 stars, 507 forks, 66 open issues and last shipped today. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 3,627% (91,498 vs 2,455 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; Exceptionless is written in C# under Apache-2.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Exceptionless 21%. Exceptionless was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | Exceptionless | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 91K | ★ 2.5K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | C# |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 507 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Exceptionless if
- You want the Exceptionless feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches C#
- You evaluated both and Exceptionless fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted monitoring tool with a reactive web dashboard, built for operators and teams that want to watch their own HTTP, TCP, and DNS endpoints and keep the resulting data on their own infrastructure.
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About Exceptionless
The definition of the word exceptionless is: to be without exception. Exceptionless provides real time error reporting for your JavaScript, Node, .NET Core, ASP.NET, Web API, WebForms, WPF, Console, and MVC apps. It organizes the gathered information into simple actionable data that will help your app become exceptionless! ⭐️ We appreciate your star, it helps! Using Exceptionless Refer to the Exceptionless documentation. Hosting Options We provide very reasonably priced hosting at Exceptionless. By using our hosted service, you are supporting the project and helping it get better! We also provide set up and suppo…
read the full Exceptionless overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or Exceptionless more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars and Exceptionless has 2,455. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and Exceptionless free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and Exceptionless under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and Exceptionless?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and Exceptionless in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or Exceptionless?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (91,498 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Exceptionless if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.