head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs evo
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. evo has 4,354 stars, 803 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 2,040% (93,190 vs 4,354 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; evo is written in Python under GPL-3.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, evo 18%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | evo | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 4.4K |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-30 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 803 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick evo if
- You want the evo feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and evo fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About evo
evo Python package for the evaluation of odometry and SLAM This package provides executables and a small library for handling, evaluating and comparing the trajectory output of odometry and SLAM algorithms. Supported trajectory formats: 'TUM' trajectory files 'KITTI' pose files 'EuRoC MAV' (.csv groundtruth and TUM trajectory file) ROS and ROS2 bagfile with geometry msgs/PoseStamped , geometry msgs/TransformStamped , geometry msgs/PoseWithCovarianceStamped , geometry msgs/PointStamped or nav msgs/Odometry topics or TF messages See here for more infos about the formats. Why? evo has several advantages over other…
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or evo more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and evo has 4,354. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and evo free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and evo under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and evo?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and evo in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or evo?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose evo if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.