head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs eliot
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. eliot has 1,189 stars, 75 forks, 120 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 7,738% (93,190 vs 1,189 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; eliot is written in Python under Apache-2.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, eliot 6%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | eliot | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 1.2K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-05-07 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 75 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick eliot if
- You want the eliot feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and eliot fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About eliot
Eliot: Logging that tells you why it happened ================================================ Python's built in logging and other similar systems output a stream of factoids: they're interesting, but you can't really tell what's going on. Why is your application slow? What caused this code path to be chosen? Why did this error happen? Standard logging can't answer these questions. But with a better model you could understand what and why things happened in your application. You could pinpoint performance bottlenecks, you could understand what happened when, who called what. That is what Eliot does. eliot is a…
read the full eliot overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or eliot more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and eliot has 1,189. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and eliot free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and eliot under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and eliot?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and eliot in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or eliot?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose eliot if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.