head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs elastdocker
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. elastdocker has 2,068 stars, 338 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 4,406% (93,190 vs 2,068 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; elastdocker is written in Dockerfile under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, elastdocker 16%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (docker), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | elastdocker | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 2.1K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | Dockerfile |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 338 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick elastdocker if
- You want the elastdocker feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Dockerfile
- You evaluated both and elastdocker fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About elastdocker
Elast ic Stack on Docker Preconfigured Security, Tools, and Self Monitoring Configured to be ready to be used for Log, Metrics, APM, Alerting, Machine Learning, and Security (SIEM) usecases. Introduction Elastic Stack ( ELK ) Docker Composition, preconfigured with Security , Monitoring , and Tools ; Up with a Single Command. Suitable for Demoing, MVPs and small production deployments. Stack Version: 9.4.2 🎉 Based on Official Elastic Docker Images You can change Elastic Stack version by setting ELK VERSION in .env file and rebuild your images. Any version = 9.0.0 is compatible with this template. ⚠️ Upgrading…
read the full elastdocker overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or elastdocker more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and elastdocker has 2,068. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and elastdocker free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and elastdocker under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and elastdocker?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and elastdocker in Dockerfile. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or elastdocker?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose elastdocker if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.