head to head · open source

Uptime Kuma vs dozzle

Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. dozzle has 14,786 stars, 651 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 530% (93,190 vs 14,786 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; dozzle is written in Go under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, dozzle 4%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (docker), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Uptime Kuma ★ 93K dozzle ★ 15K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Uptime Kuma dozzle
GitHub stars ★ 93K ★ 15K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript Go
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 8.7K ⑂ 651
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Uptime Kuma if

  • You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Uptime Kuma profile →

pick dozzle if

  • You want the dozzle feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and dozzle fits your workflow better

full dozzle profile →

About Uptime Kuma

Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…

read the full Uptime Kuma overview →

About dozzle

Dozzle dozzle.dev Dozzle is a lightweight, web based application for monitoring Docker logs in real time. It doesn't store any log files—it's designed purely for live log viewing. [!NOTE] If you like Dozzle, check out dtop , a top like application for monitoring Docker containers. It integrates with Dozzle to link directly to container logs. Features Intelligent fuzzy search for container names Search logs using regex Search logs using SQL queries Small memory footprint Split screen for viewing multiple logs Live stats with memory and CPU usage Multi user authentication with support for forward proxy…

read the full dozzle overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Uptime Kuma or dozzle more popular?

Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and dozzle has 14,786. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.

Are Uptime Kuma and dozzle free?

Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and dozzle under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and dozzle?

Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and dozzle in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or dozzle?

Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose dozzle if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.