head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs django-prometheus
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. django-prometheus has 1,675 stars, 264 forks, 101 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 5,464% (93,190 vs 1,675 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; django-prometheus is written in Python under Apache-2.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, django-prometheus 16%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | django-prometheus | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 1.7K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 264 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick django-prometheus if
- You want the django-prometheus feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and django-prometheus fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About django-prometheus
django prometheus Export Django monitoring metrics for Prometheus.io Features This library provides Prometheus metrics for Django related operations: Requests & Responses Database access done via Django ORM Cache access done via Django Cache framework Metrics Reference For a detailed list and explanation of all metrics exported by this library, see documentation/metrics.md. Usage Requirements Django = 4.2 Python 3.9 and above. Installation Install with: Or, if you're using a development version cloned from this repository: This will install prometheus client as a dependency. Quickstart In your settings.py: In…
read the full django-prometheus overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or django-prometheus more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and django-prometheus has 1,675. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and django-prometheus free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and django-prometheus under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and django-prometheus?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and django-prometheus in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or django-prometheus?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose django-prometheus if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.