head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs django-prometheus
Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars, 8,431 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped today. django-prometheus has 1,666 stars, 265 forks, 101 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 5,392% (91,498 vs 1,666 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; django-prometheus is written in Python under Apache-2.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, django-prometheus 16%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | django-prometheus | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 91K | ★ 1.7K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-07-30 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 265 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick django-prometheus if
- You want the django-prometheus feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and django-prometheus fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted monitoring tool with a reactive web dashboard, built for operators and teams that want to watch their own HTTP, TCP, and DNS endpoints and keep the resulting data on their own infrastructure.
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About django-prometheus
django prometheus Export Django monitoring metrics for Prometheus.io Features This library provides Prometheus metrics for Django related operations: Requests & Responses Database access done via Django ORM Cache access done via Django Cache framework Metrics Reference For a detailed list and explanation of all metrics exported by this library, see documentation/metrics.md. Usage Requirements Django = 4.2 Python 3.9 and above. Installation Install with: Or, if you're using a development version cloned from this repository: This will install prometheus client as a dependency. Quickstart In your settings.py: In you…
read the full django-prometheus overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or django-prometheus more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars and django-prometheus has 1,666. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and django-prometheus free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and django-prometheus under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and django-prometheus?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and django-prometheus in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or django-prometheus?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (91,498 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose django-prometheus if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.