head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs dd-trace-dotnet
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. dd-trace-dotnet has 573 stars, 176 forks, 335 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 16,164% (93,190 vs 573 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; dd-trace-dotnet is written in C# under Apache-2.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, dd-trace-dotnet 31%. dd-trace-dotnet was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | dd-trace-dotnet | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 573 |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | C# |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 176 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick dd-trace-dotnet if
- You want the dd-trace-dotnet feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches C#
- You evaluated both and dd-trace-dotnet fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About dd-trace-dotnet
Datadog APM .NET Client Libraries This repository contains the sources for the client side components of the Datadog product suite for Application Telemetry Collection and Application Performance Monitoring for .NET Applications. Datadog .NET Tracer : A set of .NET libraries that let you trace any piece of your .NET code. It automatically instruments supported libraries out of the box and also supports custom instrumentation to instrument your own code. This library powers Distributed Tracing, Application Security Management, Continuous Integration Visibility, Dynamic Instrumentation and more. Datadog .NET…
read the full dd-trace-dotnet overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or dd-trace-dotnet more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and dd-trace-dotnet has 573. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and dd-trace-dotnet free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and dd-trace-dotnet under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and dd-trace-dotnet?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and dd-trace-dotnet in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or dd-trace-dotnet?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose dd-trace-dotnet if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.