head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs crowdsec-web-ui
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. crowdsec-web-ui has 897 stars, 47 forks, 12 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 10,289% (93,190 vs 897 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; crowdsec-web-ui is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, crowdsec-web-ui 5%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (docker), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | crowdsec-web-ui | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 897 |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-30 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 47 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick crowdsec-web-ui if
- You want the crowdsec-web-ui feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and crowdsec-web-ui fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About crowdsec-web-ui
CrowdSec Web UI A self hosted dashboard for CrowdSec: investigate alerts, manage decisions, monitor runtime metrics, and send notifications from one responsive UI. Features Screenshots Quick Start You need a running CrowdSec LAPI. Connect the Web UI using either watcher password authentication or agent mTLS. 1. Register the Web UI Watcher password Replace replace with generated password with the value printed by openssl . [!IMPORTANT] Keep f /dev/null . It registers the machine without overwriting the CrowdSec container's existing credentials file. Agent mTLS Configure LAPI TLS authentication and create a client…
read the full crowdsec-web-ui overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or crowdsec-web-ui more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and crowdsec-web-ui has 897. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and crowdsec-web-ui free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and crowdsec-web-ui under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and crowdsec-web-ui?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and crowdsec-web-ui in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or crowdsec-web-ui?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose crowdsec-web-ui if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.