head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs coze-loop
Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars, 8,431 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped today. coze-loop has 5,738 stars, 795 forks, 84 open issues and last shipped today. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 1,495% (91,498 vs 5,738 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; coze-loop is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, coze-loop 14%. coze-loop was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | coze-loop | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 91K | ★ 5.7K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 795 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick coze-loop if
- You want the coze-loop feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and coze-loop fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted monitoring tool with a reactive web dashboard, built for operators and teams that want to watch their own HTTP, TCP, and DNS endpoints and keep the resulting data on their own infrastructure.
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About coze-loop
Coze Loop is a developer oriented, open source, platform level solution for the full lifecycle management of AI agents — covering prompt development, debugging, evaluation, and observability — aimed at developers and teams who build and operate AI agents.
read the full coze-loop overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or coze-loop more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars and coze-loop has 5,738. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and coze-loop free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and coze-loop under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and coze-loop?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and coze-loop in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or coze-loop?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (91,498 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose coze-loop if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.