head to head · open source

Uptime Kuma vs coze-loop

Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. coze-loop has 5,799 stars, 803 forks, 84 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 1,507% (93,190 vs 5,799 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; coze-loop is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, coze-loop 14%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Uptime Kuma ★ 93K coze-loop ★ 5.8K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Uptime Kuma coze-loop
GitHub stars ★ 93K ★ 5.8K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in JavaScript Go
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 8.7K ⑂ 803
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Uptime Kuma if

  • You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Uptime Kuma profile →

pick coze-loop if

  • You want the coze-loop feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and coze-loop fits your workflow better

full coze-loop profile →

About Uptime Kuma

Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…

read the full Uptime Kuma overview →

About coze-loop

Coze Loop • Feature list • Quick start • Developer guide English 中文 What is Coze Loop Coze Loop is a developer oriented, platform level solution focused on the development and operation of AI agents. It addresses various challenges faced during the AI agent development process, providing full lifecycle management capabilities from development, debugging, evaluation, to monitoring. Based on the commercial version, Coze Loop introduces an open source edition that offers developers free access to core foundational feature modules. By sharing its core technology framework in an open source model, developers can…

read the full coze-loop overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Uptime Kuma or coze-loop more popular?

Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and coze-loop has 5,799. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.

Are Uptime Kuma and coze-loop free?

Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and coze-loop under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and coze-loop?

Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and coze-loop in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or coze-loop?

Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose coze-loop if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.