head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs Coroot
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Coroot has 7,999 stars, 416 forks, 117 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 1,065% (93,190 vs 7,999 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; Coroot is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Coroot 5%. Coroot was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | Coroot | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 8.0K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 416 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Coroot if
- You want the Coroot feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and Coroot fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About Coroot
Features Installation Documentation Community & Support Live demo Coroot Enterprise Open source observability augmented with actionable insights Collecting metrics, logs, and traces alone doesn't make your applications observable. Coroot turns that data into actionable insights for you! Features Zero instrumentation observability Metrics, logs, traces, and profiles are gathered automatically by using eBPF Coroot provides you with a Service Map that covers 100% of your system with no blind spots Predefined inspections audit each application without any configuration Application Health Summary Easily understand…
read the full Coroot overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or Coroot more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and Coroot has 7,999. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and Coroot free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and Coroot under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and Coroot?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and Coroot in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or Coroot?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Coroot if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.