head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs clp
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. clp has 1,091 stars, 95 forks, 493 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 8,442% (93,190 vs 1,091 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; clp is written in C++ under Apache-2.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, clp 9%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | clp | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 1.1K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | C++ |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 95 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick clp if
- You want the clp feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches C++
- You evaluated both and clp fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About clp
[![Discord][badge discord]][clp community discord] [![Slack][badge slack]][clp community slack] [![CLP on Zulip][badge zulip]][yscope community zulip] YScope's Compressed Log Processor (CLP) compresses your logs, and allows you to search the compressed logs without decompression. CLP supports both JSON logs and unstructured (i.e., free text) logs. It also supports real time log compression within several logging libraries. CLP also includes purpose built web interfaces for searching and viewing the compressed logs. To learn more about it, read our [2021 paper][clp paper 21] about handling unstructured logs and…
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or clp more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and clp has 1,091. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and clp free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and clp under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and clp?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and clp in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or clp?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose clp if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.