head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs clp
Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars, 8,431 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. clp has 1,088 stars, 92 forks, 493 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 8,310% (91,498 vs 1,088 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; clp is written in C++ under Apache-2.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, clp 8%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 13541 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | clp | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 91K | ★ 1.1K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | C++ |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 92 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick clp if
- You want the clp feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches C++
- You evaluated both and clp fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted monitoring tool with a reactive web dashboard, built for operators and teams that want to watch their own HTTP, TCP, and DNS endpoints and keep the resulting data on their own infrastructure.
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About clp
CLP (Compressed Log Processor) is YScope's free, Apache 2.0 licensed log management tool, written in C++, that compresses JSON and unstructured logs and allows those compressed logs to be searched without decompression, aimed at engineers and operators who store and query large volumes of logs.
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or clp more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars and clp has 1,088. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and clp free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and clp under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and clp?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and clp in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or clp?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (91,498 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose clp if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.