head to head · open source

Uptime Kuma vs clockwork

Uptime Kuma has 91,477 GitHub stars, 8,426 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. clockwork has 5,950 stars, 333 forks, 39 open issues and last shipped 20 days ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 1,437% (91,477 vs 5,950 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; clockwork is written in PHP under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, clockwork 6%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Uptime Kuma ★ 91K clockwork ★ 6.0K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Uptime Kuma clockwork
GitHub stars ★ 91K ★ 6.0K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript PHP
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-08-29
Forks ⑂ 8.4K ⑂ 333
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Uptime Kuma if

  • You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Uptime Kuma profile →

pick clockwork if

  • You want the clockwork feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You evaluated both and clockwork fits your workflow better

full clockwork profile →

About Uptime Kuma

Uptime Kuma is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted monitoring tool with a reactive web dashboard, built for operators and teams that want to watch their own HTTP, TCP, and DNS endpoints and keep the resulting data on their own infrastructure.

read the full Uptime Kuma overview →

About clockwork

Clockwork is a development tool for PHP that gives developers an insight into their application runtime — including request data, performance metrics, log entries, database queries, cache queries, redis commands, dispatched events, queued jobs and rendered views — right in the browser, and this repository contains its server side component.

read the full clockwork overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K Grafana ★ 77K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn uptime-kuma vs openvpn uptime-kuma vs wr-do uptime-kuma vs plakar uptime-kuma vs pluton worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Uptime Kuma vs worldmonitor Uptime Kuma vs NetData Uptime Kuma vs Grafana Uptime Kuma vs huginn Uptime Kuma vs Sentry Uptime Kuma vs SigNoz Uptime Kuma vs Grafana Loki Uptime Kuma vs beszel Uptime Kuma vs cilium Uptime Kuma vs Apache SkyWalking Uptime Kuma vs jaeger Uptime Kuma vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is Uptime Kuma or clockwork more popular?

Uptime Kuma has 91,477 GitHub stars and clockwork has 5,950. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.

Are Uptime Kuma and clockwork free?

Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and clockwork under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and clockwork?

Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and clockwork in PHP. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or clockwork?

Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (91,477 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose clockwork if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.