head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs client_python
Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars, 8,431 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped today. client_python has 4,375 stars, 876 forks, 150 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 1,991% (91,498 vs 4,375 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; client_python is written in Python under Apache-2.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, client_python 20%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | client_python | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 91K | ★ 4.4K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-15 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 876 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick client_python if
- You want the client_python feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and client_python fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted monitoring tool with a reactive web dashboard, built for operators and teams that want to watch their own HTTP, TCP, and DNS endpoints and keep the resulting data on their own infrastructure.
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About client_python
client python is the official Prometheus instrumentation library for Python applications, letting Python code expose metrics that a Prometheus server collects, and it is aimed at Python developers and reliability engineers who need their services measurable inside a Prometheus monitoring stack.
read the full client_python overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or client_python more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars and client_python has 4,375. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and client_python free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and client_python under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and client_python?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and client_python in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or client_python?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (91,498 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose client_python if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.