head to head · open source

Uptime Kuma vs client_java

Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars, 8,431 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped today. client_java has 2,289 stars, 833 forks, 23 open issues and last shipped today. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 3,897% (91,498 vs 2,289 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; client_java is written in Java under Apache-2.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, client_java 36%. client_java was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Uptime Kuma ★ 91K client_java ★ 2.3K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Uptime Kuma client_java
GitHub stars ★ 91K ★ 2.3K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in JavaScript Java
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 8.4K ⑂ 833
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Uptime Kuma if

  • You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Uptime Kuma profile →

pick client_java if

  • You want the client_java feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and client_java fits your workflow better

full client_java profile →

About Uptime Kuma

Uptime Kuma is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted monitoring tool with a reactive web dashboard, built for operators and teams that want to watch their own HTTP, TCP, and DNS endpoints and keep the resulting data on their own infrastructure.

read the full Uptime Kuma overview →

About client_java

Prometheus Java Metrics Library [![Build][build badge]][build workflow] [build badge]: [build workflow]: Documentation Contributing and community See CONTRIBUTING.md and the community section of the Prometheus homepage. The Prometheus Java community is present on the CNCF Slack on prometheus java , and we have a fortnightly community call in the Prometheus public calendar. Previous Releases The source code for 0.16.0 and older is on the simpleclient branch. License Apache License 2.0, see LICENSE.

read the full client_java overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K Grafana ★ 77K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn uptime-kuma vs openvpn uptime-kuma vs wr-do uptime-kuma vs plakar uptime-kuma vs pluton worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Uptime Kuma vs worldmonitor Uptime Kuma vs NetData Uptime Kuma vs Grafana Uptime Kuma vs huginn Uptime Kuma vs Sentry Uptime Kuma vs SigNoz Uptime Kuma vs Grafana Loki Uptime Kuma vs beszel Uptime Kuma vs cilium Uptime Kuma vs Apache SkyWalking Uptime Kuma vs jaeger Uptime Kuma vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is Uptime Kuma or client_java more popular?

Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars and client_java has 2,289. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.

Are Uptime Kuma and client_java free?

Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and client_java under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and client_java?

Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and client_java in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or client_java?

Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (91,498 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose client_java if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.