head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs claude-devtools
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. claude-devtools has 4,009 stars, 308 forks, 50 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 2,225% (93,190 vs 4,009 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; claude-devtools is written in TypeScript under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, claude-devtools 8%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | claude-devtools | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 4.0K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-09-26 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 308 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick claude-devtools if
- You want the claude-devtools feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and claude-devtools fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About claude-devtools
claude devtools Your Claude is coding blind. See everything it did. The debugging tool for Claude Code. Read session transcripts, inspect tool calls, track token usage — directly from the Claude Code logs on your machine. Your browser does not support the video tag. The Problem Claude Code started hiding what it does. Since v2.1.20, Claude Code replaced detailed output with opaque summaries. Read 3 files . Searched for 1 pattern . Edited 2 files . No file paths. No content. No line numbers. The community backlash was immediate. But the problem goes deeper than collapsed file paths: Thinking steps — Claude's…
read the full claude-devtools overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or claude-devtools more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and claude-devtools has 4,009. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and claude-devtools free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and claude-devtools under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and claude-devtools?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and claude-devtools in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or claude-devtools?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose claude-devtools if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.