head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs bottom
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. bottom has 14,149 stars, 402 forks, 103 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 559% (93,190 vs 14,149 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; bottom is written in Rust under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, bottom 3%. bottom was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | bottom | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 14K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 402 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick bottom if
- You want the bottom feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and bottom fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About bottom
bottom (btm) A customizable cross platform graphical process/system monitor for the terminal. Supports Linux, macOS, and Windows. Inspired by gtop , gotop , and htop . Demo using the Gruvbox theme ( theme gruvbox ), along with IBM Plex Mono and Kitty Table of contents Features Support Official Unofficial Installation Cargo Alpine Arch Linux Debian / Ubuntu Exherbo Linux Fedora / CentOS / AlmaLinux / Rocky Linux COPR Terra RPM Gentoo Nix openSUSE Snap Solus Void Homebrew MacPorts Chocolatey Scoop winget Windows installer (MSI) Conda gah ghr mise Pre built binaries Auto completion Usage Configuration…
read the full bottom overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or bottom more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and bottom has 14,149. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and bottom free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and bottom under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and bottom?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and bottom in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or bottom?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose bottom if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.