head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs AutoKuma
Uptime Kuma has 91,477 GitHub stars, 8,426 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. AutoKuma has 898 stars, 47 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 10,087% (91,477 vs 898 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; AutoKuma is written in Rust under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, AutoKuma 5%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 8 topic tags (docker, monitor, monitoring, selfhosted), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | AutoKuma | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 91K | ★ 898 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-06-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 47 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick AutoKuma if
- You want the AutoKuma feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and AutoKuma fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted monitoring tool with a reactive web dashboard, built for operators and teams that want to watch their own HTTP, TCP, and DNS endpoints and keep the resulting data on their own infrastructure.
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About AutoKuma
AutoKuma is an MIT licensed Rust utility that creates Uptime Kuma monitors automatically from Docker container labels, .json / .toml files, or Kubernetes custom resources, made for self hosters and operators who run Uptime Kuma next to containerized services and do not want to add monitors one by one in the web UI.
read the full AutoKuma overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or AutoKuma more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 91,477 GitHub stars and AutoKuma has 898. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and AutoKuma free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and AutoKuma under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and AutoKuma?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and AutoKuma in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or AutoKuma?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (91,477 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose AutoKuma if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.