head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs AutoKuma
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. AutoKuma has 922 stars, 48 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 10,007% (93,190 vs 922 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; AutoKuma is written in Rust under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, AutoKuma 5%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 8 topic tags (docker, monitor, monitoring, selfhosted), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | AutoKuma | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 922 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-06-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 48 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick AutoKuma if
- You want the AutoKuma feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and AutoKuma fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About AutoKuma
AutoKuma    Kuma CLI    Kuma Client    Documentation    Playground AutoKuma 🐻 AutoKuma is a utility that automates the creation of Uptime Kuma monitors based on Docker container labels. With AutoKuma, you can eliminate the need for manual monitor creation in the Uptime Kuma UI. Supported Sources These sources are supported on an as is basis as I'm currently not running any of them (they are basically looking for a maintainer, please get in contact if you'd like to adopt one or add support for another source). Quick Start 🚀 The fastest way to get going is with Docker Compose…
read the full AutoKuma overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or AutoKuma more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and AutoKuma has 922. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and AutoKuma free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and AutoKuma under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and AutoKuma?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and AutoKuma in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or AutoKuma?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose AutoKuma if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.