head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs auto-cpufreq
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. auto-cpufreq has 7,859 stars, 360 forks, 79 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 1,086% (93,190 vs 7,859 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; auto-cpufreq is written in Python under GPL-3.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, auto-cpufreq 5%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | auto-cpufreq | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 7.9K |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-28 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 360 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick auto-cpufreq if
- You want the auto-cpufreq feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and auto-cpufreq fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About auto-cpufreq
auto cpufreq Automatic CPU speed & power optimizer for Linux. Actively monitors laptop battery state, CPU usage, CPU temperature, and system load, ultimately allowing you to improve battery life without making any compromises. For tl;dr folks: Youtube: From 10 day vacation project to 100k users: auto cpufreq v3 story Blog post: From 10 day vacation project to 100k users: auto cpufreq v3 story Youtube: auto cpufreq v2.0 release & demo of all available features and options Blog post: auto cpufreq v2.0 Youtube: auto cpufreq tool demo Blog post: auto cpufreq – Automatic CPU speed & power optimizer for Linux If…
read the full auto-cpufreq overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or auto-cpufreq more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and auto-cpufreq has 7,859. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and auto-cpufreq free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and auto-cpufreq under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and auto-cpufreq?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and auto-cpufreq in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or auto-cpufreq?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose auto-cpufreq if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.