head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs auto-cpufreq
Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars, 8,431 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped today. auto-cpufreq has 7,760 stars, 356 forks, 79 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 1,079% (91,498 vs 7,760 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; auto-cpufreq is written in Python under GPL-3.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, auto-cpufreq 5%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | auto-cpufreq | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 91K | ★ 7.8K |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-12 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 356 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick auto-cpufreq if
- You want the auto-cpufreq feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and auto-cpufreq fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted monitoring tool with a reactive web dashboard, built for operators and teams that want to watch their own HTTP, TCP, and DNS endpoints and keep the resulting data on their own infrastructure.
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About auto-cpufreq
auto cpufreq is a GPL 3.0 Python daemon and command line tool that watches a Linux laptop's battery state, CPU usage, CPU temperature, and system load, then adjusts CPU frequency and power settings automatically for users who want longer battery life without giving up responsiveness.
read the full auto-cpufreq overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or auto-cpufreq more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars and auto-cpufreq has 7,760. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and auto-cpufreq free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and auto-cpufreq under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and auto-cpufreq?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and auto-cpufreq in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or auto-cpufreq?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (91,498 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose auto-cpufreq if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.