head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs aspire-samples
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. aspire-samples has 1,201 stars, 347 forks, 112 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 7,659% (93,190 vs 1,201 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; aspire-samples is written in C# under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, aspire-samples 29%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (docker), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | aspire-samples | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 1.2K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | C# |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 347 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick aspire-samples if
- You want the aspire-samples feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches C#
- You evaluated both and aspire-samples fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About aspire-samples
Aspire Samples Samples for Aspire. Aspire is a developer first toolset that streamlines integrating front ends, APIs, containers, and databases with your apps. Learn more about Aspire here. Browse by scenario Full stack JavaScript / TypeScript Polyglot full stack Backend integrations by language Cloud / AI / event driven .NET + frontend and platform Full stack JavaScript / TypeScript Polyglot full stack Backend integrations by language Cloud / AI / event driven .NET + frontend and platform eShop eShop is a reference application implementing an eCommerce web site on a services based architecture using Aspire…
read the full aspire-samples overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or aspire-samples more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and aspire-samples has 1,201. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and aspire-samples free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and aspire-samples under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and aspire-samples?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and aspire-samples in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or aspire-samples?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose aspire-samples if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.